A US-led Gaza resolution creates a fragile security architecture built on external supervision and a stabilisation force with little Palestinian consent.
The framing of Gaza's stabilisation through externl management rather than Palestinian agency really exposes the core contradiction here. When you strip disarmament of any political guarantees, you're essentially asking factions to surrender their security without ensuring their sovereignty. The fact that Indonesia and Pakistan are willing to deploy troops while regional powers like UAE and Egypt hesitate tells you everything about burden shring calculus. This feels less like peacebuilding and more like outsourcing occupation through a multilateral framework.
The framing of Gaza's stabilisation through externl management rather than Palestinian agency really exposes the core contradiction here. When you strip disarmament of any political guarantees, you're essentially asking factions to surrender their security without ensuring their sovereignty. The fact that Indonesia and Pakistan are willing to deploy troops while regional powers like UAE and Egypt hesitate tells you everything about burden shring calculus. This feels less like peacebuilding and more like outsourcing occupation through a multilateral framework.
Agreed